Difference between revisions of "Ladder escape fork"
m (→Example: grammar) |
(Started a section on "How far can the attacker climb". Added switchback forks.) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Ha7 Hb7 H2c7 | Ha7 Hb7 H2c7 | ||
</hex> | </hex> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == How far can the attacker climb? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The effectiveness of a potential fork can be measured by how far the attacker can potentially [[climbing|climb]]. Let us consider some typical ladders and potential forks: | ||
| + | |||
| + | === 2nd row ladder === | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the first example, Red's space is limited. Red can climb to the 4th row, potentially [[bridge|bridging]] to a stone on the 6th row. | ||
| + | <hexboard size="6x7" | ||
| + | coords="hide" | ||
| + | contents="R a5 b5 c5 B a6 b6 c6 d4 f5 R 1:e5 B 2:d5 R 3:f3" | ||
| + | /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | If Red has slightly more space, Red can climb to the 5th row, potentially bridging to a stone on the 7th row. | ||
| + | <hexboard size="6x7" | ||
| + | coords="hide" | ||
| + | contents="R a5 b5 c5 B a6 b6 c6 f5 R 1:e5 B 2:d5 R 3:e4 B 4:d4 R 5:f2" | ||
| + | /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Finally, in a [[switchback]] situation, where a 2nd-to-4th row switchback would allow Red to connect, Red can climb to the 6th row, potentially bridging to a stone on the 8th row. This kind of forking ladder escape is called a ''switchback fork''. | ||
| + | <hexboard size="6x7" | ||
| + | coords="hide" | ||
| + | contents="R a5 b5 c5 a4 b3 B a6 b6 c6 b4 f5 R 1:e5 B 2:d5 R 3:f3 B 4:e3 R 5:g1" | ||
| + | /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Of course, there are many variations of this, depending on what other pieces Red and Blue have on the board. But the three basic patterns shown above are the most common, and are good starting points for planning more complex ladder escape forks. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 15:30, 29 November 2020
A forking move which creates a ladder escape.
Example
In the following position, Red has no edge template.
The only option seems to be a ladder.
However, pushing the ladder too much is useless, and it actually enables Blue to win.
Red needs the two pieces at the top right hand-corner of the board. Red pushes the ladder just enough to use a ladder escape fork. This pivot piece threatens to connect to the top group and acts as a ladder escape as well.
How far can the attacker climb?
The effectiveness of a potential fork can be measured by how far the attacker can potentially climb. Let us consider some typical ladders and potential forks:
2nd row ladder
In the first example, Red's space is limited. Red can climb to the 4th row, potentially bridging to a stone on the 6th row.
If Red has slightly more space, Red can climb to the 5th row, potentially bridging to a stone on the 7th row.
Finally, in a switchback situation, where a 2nd-to-4th row switchback would allow Red to connect, Red can climb to the 6th row, potentially bridging to a stone on the 8th row. This kind of forking ladder escape is called a switchback fork.
Of course, there are many variations of this, depending on what other pieces Red and Blue have on the board. But the three basic patterns shown above are the most common, and are good starting points for planning more complex ladder escape forks.
